Lost horrors: how the eerie telly of the 1970s birthed liminal dread

Or: if you’ve got no budget, chuck in a corridor

The liminal is always there, waiting for us. That empty classroom, quiet after all the kids have gone home. The cracked tarmac of the car park late in the afternoon. Any hotel room ever. In any hotel. All deserted, but freighted with presence. The liminal can always wait us out. It has nothing, but time on its hands.

The liminal as an aesthetic is everywhere now. Just look at Apple TV’s hit show, Severance, which builds an overbearing sense of anxiety through (among other things) the use of oppressively indistinguishable office spaces. Or the neo-retro bureaucratic vibe of Marvel’s Time Variance Authority.

Looking at my own work, I love nothing better than an empty stretch of torn up concrete, a relentless corridor or a dead beach full of office furniture. And I think my interest in these things is a product of the period I grew up in.

Reality was spongy underfoot in the mid-seventies. The high price of oil meant that there were power cuts and a three-day week. Regional magazine programmes regularly ran segments on the paranormal. Cursed objects, werewolves and vampires may have been reported in a gently mocking style, but their irony wasn’t something my kid brain could parse. If something was on a news programme that meant it was “real”.

That’s before we even look at some of the programming intended for children back then. As Richard Littler, creator of Scarfolk puts it, we were, “a generation … glued to the TV, exposed to a world where much of what [we] saw seemed slightly unhinged.”

The cultural theoretician and de-facto hauntological-cult-leader, Mark Fisher has already pointed out just how strange ITV’s paranormal science-fiction programme Sapphire and Steele was (and remains). But this was just one show among much odd programming that generated an appreciation for the eerie in the kids watching it.

The Changes in whose first episode, a family, (complete with pipe-wielding dad), completely lose their shit and smash every piece of technology more advanced than a candlestick was deeply disturbing. Equally unsettling were the undiluted folk-horror weirdness of ITV’s The Children of the Stones which portrayed a village locked in a brainwashing psychic time-loop or the creepily inappropriate adaptation of Alan Garner’s The Owl Service, where the underlying sexual charge of some scenes make it an uneasy watch today.

The subtext of many of these programmes can probably be generalised as a recoil from modernity, but shopping for candles with my mum made me feel that modernity, at least as I understood it at the time, seemed to be recoiling from us. These were programmes that gestured toward the grown-up world, while also heavily implying that adults didn’t have a clue about what was really going on. We all sat around the flickering TV set, waiting to be plunged into darkness by the next power cut.

“Home again, home again, jiggity jig.” Tarkovsky’s Stalker

While much of the eerie charge of these programmes was a product of their time, the cheaper-than-thou production costs and the limits of seventies special effects meant much had to be evoked and little shown (similar to the approach of Tarkovsky’s ‘Stalker’ were the uncanny mood is established, mostly, through performances, music and dialogue). The net result is a lurking sense of lack, reminiscent of Fisher’s ideas about how the eerie arises from some types of absence. To me, the scariest parts of the BBC’s mythic MR James adaptations were always the long tracking shots of the misty East Anglia coast rather than spectres swaddled in bedsheets.

But this form couldn’t really survive exposure to Thatcher’s Britain of the 1980s. Brightly lit, in primary colours, the eerie never stood a chance against Wham! shoving shuttlecocks down their shorts. Perhaps, nothing represents this shift better than the way Dr Who’s hauntingly wheezy Ron Grainer/Delia Derbyshire analogue theme tune was replaced by a mid-80s farting synth score.

Despite this particular brand of eerie evaporating, it did leave a psychic imprint: a sensibility characterised as an anxiety for what might be shown rather than what was. It primed my generation, I think, making us receptive to the sinister languor of Lynch’s mirror-universe Americana; checked us all into Kubrick’s Overlook hotel and sat us down in front of a TV tuned directly into the signal from Cronenberg’s Videodrome. These three directors, for me, really take the wobbly-set principles of cut-price British telly and formulate it into a coherent aesthetic of the uneasy.

The creepy-as-fuck Tommy-cam shots of the Overlook’s corridors, build an almost unbearable tension. Similarly, Lynch’s opening shot in Blue Velvet gives us an idealised suburbia complete with a white picket fence, before slow dive zooming, to reveal the insect life that roils in the lawn grass. Cronenberg’s opening in Videodrome announcing CIVIC-TV as, “the one you take to bed with you” perhaps suggests something even more transgressive and intimate, a merging of the body and the broadcast.

It’s tempting then, to consider these as the flip side to French theorist Jacque Derrida’s ‘lost futures’ of hauntology: the idea that our current cultural stagnation (witness conveyer-belt reboots and IP freighted properties) is a result of our inability to escape the nostalgia surrounding the futures we were promised, but which never arrived. Here though, the eerie spaces of the liminal evoke something new, something more akin to lost horrors.

I would argue, that while mainstream culture might be locked into an endless rinse-repeat cycle, these sensibilities have seeped into online culture to generate real innovation. The unease aesthetic is the basis for the crowd-sourced horror of creepy-pasta, the liminal crap-office creepiness of the Backrooms or the cheap-as-chips-and-twice-as-daft scares of Life of Luxury, where internet influencer culture meets mid-west subprime-mortgage horror. These are the nightmares dreamed by the children of the “New Flesh” and ARPANET.

Given all this, it’s perhaps no surprise that the London I portray in The Lighthouse at the End of the World is full of edge spaces. It’s Donald Pleasance’s “Lonely Water” voiceover at 3AM in that waste ground where the council stores the bins. These were the spaces I played in as a kid. The equivalent to the modern digital eerie, where bots shit-post each other on the dead internet and ghost sites crumble from bit rot.

My book is not a horror novel in any real sense, but it’s built on the foundations of the liminal. Its antagonist, Mr Primrose, has a deep understanding of thresholds and how the eerie emerges from them. He uses this knowledge to manifest on bridges, tower block roofs or the concrete gloom of a business park. He understands it’s a texture woven into the torn-up tarmac and the shredded weeds. You can always find it at the edge of things, if you know where to look.

And that seems only as it should be.


A version of this essay was first published at Ginger Nuts of Horror which I heartily recommend. My debut fantasy novel, The Lighthouse at the End of the World, the first in the Cities of the Drift series is out now from Titan Books. You can purchase it here.

Less something broadcast and more something that slipped through: Schalcken the Painter

“Turn from the light. Your breast bare. Look into the dark.”

I encountered the BBC’s adaptation of Schalcken the Painter one Christmas night in 1979. Looking at Wikipedia now, I can confidently inform you that it was shown under the Beeb’s Omnibus arts umbrella, part of the corporation’s a Ghost Story at Christmas tradition. Since then, it has rarely been repeated, although the BFI released an edition of the film on DVD about a decade ago which is where I rediscovered it.

But that first viewing many years ago, was part of the serendipity of the three terrestrial TV channels of the time. As a child, I’d just turn the dial to commune with the great collective unconscious in the sky and keep turning it until something found me.

The “Schalcken” commissioned for the TV production depicting the doomed Rose and the painter in the background. Artist unknown.

Schalcken was that something. Feeling much less like a programme than something that manifested when I was up later than I should have been, it was a story beamed directly into me. Without knowing anything about it or having a copy of the Radio Times to hand, the film was charged with what Simon Reynolds might call a hauntological atmosphere, a static-tinged invocation of the past where the absence of any context felt like a presence. It was less like something that had been programmed and more akin to something that had slipped through.

The film is an adaptation of Sheridan Le Fanu’s short story of the same name. Both centre on a young Dutch painter, Godfried Schalcken, who was known for candlelit portraits of young women that were both suggestive and intimate. Apprenticed to the miserly Gerrit Dou, the story concerns one such work by the young painter. It depicts a woman carrying a candle while the figure of Schalcken himself stands behind her, sword half-drawn. A shadowy something lurks nearby.Subscribed

Narrated by Charles Gray, the film reveals that Schalcken produced the painting after experiencing a terrifying vision of his lost love, Rose, Gerrit Dou’s niece, following her marriage to an unearthly rival, Minheer Vanderhausen. After the marriage, she returns to the family home to beg for help, but Schalcken is unable to aid her. Subsequently, he becomes embittered and is ruined by ambition and regret. Cursed by strange visions of Rose’s fate, he paints the picture that is the tale’s inspiration.

Looking back now, for me the most striking aspect of Leslie Megahey’s production was its sound design. The foley work is close-miked, claustrophobic and opinionated. Coins clatter guiltily. Mealtimes are a medley of scraped cutlery and clocks ticking. Above all, the ghoulish Vanderhausen is introduced by a subtle creaking cue and a basso throb.

Maurice Denham is at his gnomic best as the acerbic Gerrit Dou. (Setting up one scene for his students, he dismissively indicates his two models: “St Anthony. Temptation. Devils … you will imagine the devils”). Jeremy Clyde’s Schalcken is at once amoral and careerist. Cheryl Kennedy’s Rose is, alas, little more than a human plot point. And there is something magnificently ghastly in John James’ monolithic Vanderhausen.Subscribed

Many of the film’s scenes are painterly tableaux that echo the Dutch Masters. They are composed as slow, locked-off shots demanding attention and suggestive that things are happening just outside their frame. The overall pace is profoundly mesmeric. As a kid who revelled in the reckless blood-spurting, page-turning chaos of 2000 AD, the film’s sense of stillness was agonising and compelling.

If Le Fanu’s original tale is a masterful example of gothic grimoire, Megahey’s adaptation is more satisfyingly grounded and disturbing, I think, in that it explores aspects that the source material only hints at. Namely, the commodification of the erotic, the sex worker economy and the casual treatment of Rose as an object for sale to the highest bidder, in this case the eminently unsuitable Vanderhausen.

Encountering this film without any context made it all the more unnerving. Lacking much to orient me, its docudrama approach, unsettling atmosphere and languorous sense of dread were perfect. But I do wonder how much of its impact was a function of the way it found me, free of frames of reference or any sense of what it was.

A perfect example, perhaps, of the uncanny as a format rather than a plot, its final few scenes lurking in my memory for days after I saw it and still capable of evoking a sense of dread years later. But that mood lay not only in the tale itself, but in how it arrived, formally unplaceable, aesthetically estranged. Schalcken the Painter wasn’t just uncanny in content. For me, bathing in the flickering TV light that night, it was the uncanny

Years later, I rediscovered the film and watching it now, it’s still chilling, but since I know so much about it, its sense of dread has receded. Knowledge of its origin has dispelled its hauntological charge. That notion I had of not-knowing, the feeling I was watching something that might be forbidden has faded, taking with it the creeping sensation that instead of a slightly hokey Christmas ghost story, I was witnessing a transmission from the outside.

My weird fantasy debut The Lighthouse at the End of the World is published by Titan Books April 2026. Pre-order it here.

Questions for this issue:

  • I’d love to hear from anyone else who has encountered the uncanny as format?

Playlist

  • You can hear Sheridan Le Fanu’s original gothic tale read by the wonderful Ian McDiarmid here.
  • Watch Leslie Megahey’s the adaption here. You’ll need to login due to age restrictions (there is some nudity, well, it was the 1970s). The reproduction is low quality, although IMHO that only adds to its atmosphere.
  • The BFI’s Graham Fuller analyses the film: https://www.bfi.org.uk/features/why-i-love-schalcken-painter
  • You can buy the BFI DVD edition here. Apologies for the Amazon link but the BFI shop seems to be closed right now.