Lost horrors: how the eerie telly of the 1970s birthed liminal dread

Or: if you’ve got no budget, chuck in a corridor

The liminal is always there, waiting for us. That empty classroom, quiet after all the kids have gone home. The cracked tarmac of the car park late in the afternoon. Any hotel room ever. In any hotel. All deserted, but freighted with presence. The liminal can always wait us out. It has nothing, but time on its hands.

The liminal as an aesthetic is everywhere now. Just look at Apple TV’s hit show, Severance, which builds an overbearing sense of anxiety through (among other things) the use of oppressively indistinguishable office spaces. Or the neo-retro bureaucratic vibe of Marvel’s Time Variance Authority.

Looking at my own work, I love nothing better than an empty stretch of torn up concrete, a relentless corridor or a dead beach full of office furniture. And I think my interest in these things is a product of the period I grew up in.

Reality was spongy underfoot in the mid-seventies. The high price of oil meant that there were power cuts and a three-day week. Regional magazine programmes regularly ran segments on the paranormal. Cursed objects, werewolves and vampires may have been reported in a gently mocking style, but their irony wasn’t something my kid brain could parse. If something was on a news programme that meant it was “real”.

That’s before we even look at some of the programming intended for children back then. As Richard Littler, creator of Scarfolk puts it, we were, “a generation … glued to the TV, exposed to a world where much of what [we] saw seemed slightly unhinged.”

The cultural theoretician and de-facto hauntological-cult-leader, Mark Fisher has already pointed out just how strange ITV’s paranormal science-fiction programme Sapphire and Steele was (and remains). But this was just one show among much odd programming that generated an appreciation for the eerie in the kids watching it.

The Changes in whose first episode, a family, (complete with pipe-wielding dad), completely lose their shit and smash every piece of technology more advanced than a candlestick was deeply disturbing. Equally unsettling were the undiluted folk-horror weirdness of ITV’s The Children of the Stones which portrayed a village locked in a brainwashing psychic time-loop or the creepily inappropriate adaptation of Alan Garner’s The Owl Service, where the underlying sexual charge of some scenes make it an uneasy watch today.

The subtext of many of these programmes can probably be generalised as a recoil from modernity, but shopping for candles with my mum made me feel that modernity, at least as I understood it at the time, seemed to be recoiling from us. These were programmes that gestured toward the grown-up world, while also heavily implying that adults didn’t have a clue about what was really going on. We all sat around the flickering TV set, waiting to be plunged into darkness by the next power cut.

“Home again, home again, jiggity jig.” Tarkovsky’s Stalker

While much of the eerie charge of these programmes was a product of their time, the cheaper-than-thou production costs and the limits of seventies special effects meant much had to be evoked and little shown (similar to the approach of Tarkovsky’s ‘Stalker’ were the uncanny mood is established, mostly, through performances, music and dialogue). The net result is a lurking sense of lack, reminiscent of Fisher’s ideas about how the eerie arises from some types of absence. To me, the scariest parts of the BBC’s mythic MR James adaptations were always the long tracking shots of the misty East Anglia coast rather than spectres swaddled in bedsheets.

But this form couldn’t really survive exposure to Thatcher’s Britain of the 1980s. Brightly lit, in primary colours, the eerie never stood a chance against Wham! shoving shuttlecocks down their shorts. Perhaps, nothing represents this shift better than the way Dr Who’s hauntingly wheezy Ron Grainer/Delia Derbyshire analogue theme tune was replaced by a mid-80s farting synth score.

Despite this particular brand of eerie evaporating, it did leave a psychic imprint: a sensibility characterised as an anxiety for what might be shown rather than what was. It primed my generation, I think, making us receptive to the sinister languor of Lynch’s mirror-universe Americana; checked us all into Kubrick’s Overlook hotel and sat us down in front of a TV tuned directly into the signal from Cronenberg’s Videodrome. These three directors, for me, really take the wobbly-set principles of cut-price British telly and formulate it into a coherent aesthetic of the uneasy.

The creepy-as-fuck Tommy-cam shots of the Overlook’s corridors, build an almost unbearable tension. Similarly, Lynch’s opening shot in Blue Velvet gives us an idealised suburbia complete with a white picket fence, before slow dive zooming, to reveal the insect life that roils in the lawn grass. Cronenberg’s opening in Videodrome announcing CIVIC-TV as, “the one you take to bed with you” perhaps suggests something even more transgressive and intimate, a merging of the body and the broadcast.

It’s tempting then, to consider these as the flip side to French theorist Jacque Derrida’s ‘lost futures’ of hauntology: the idea that our current cultural stagnation (witness conveyer-belt reboots and IP freighted properties) is a result of our inability to escape the nostalgia surrounding the futures we were promised, but which never arrived. Here though, the eerie spaces of the liminal evoke something new, something more akin to lost horrors.

I would argue, that while mainstream culture might be locked into an endless rinse-repeat cycle, these sensibilities have seeped into online culture to generate real innovation. The unease aesthetic is the basis for the crowd-sourced horror of creepy-pasta, the liminal crap-office creepiness of the Backrooms or the cheap-as-chips-and-twice-as-daft scares of Life of Luxury, where internet influencer culture meets mid-west subprime-mortgage horror. These are the nightmares dreamed by the children of the “New Flesh” and ARPANET.

Given all this, it’s perhaps no surprise that the London I portray in The Lighthouse at the End of the World is full of edge spaces. It’s Donald Pleasance’s “Lonely Water” voiceover at 3AM in that waste ground where the council stores the bins. These were the spaces I played in as a kid. The equivalent to the modern digital eerie, where bots shit-post each other on the dead internet and ghost sites crumble from bit rot.

My book is not a horror novel in any real sense, but it’s built on the foundations of the liminal. Its antagonist, Mr Primrose, has a deep understanding of thresholds and how the eerie emerges from them. He uses this knowledge to manifest on bridges, tower block roofs or the concrete gloom of a business park. He understands it’s a texture woven into the torn-up tarmac and the shredded weeds. You can always find it at the edge of things, if you know where to look.

And that seems only as it should be.


A version of this essay was first published at Ginger Nuts of Horror which I heartily recommend. My debut fantasy novel, The Lighthouse at the End of the World, the first in the Cities of the Drift series is out now from Titan Books. You can purchase it here.

Alien³: of bald caps and bad dreams

[Warning: contains a brief mention of sexual violence and major spoilers for Alien³ ]

Welcome to an occasional series of posts where I kick around sequels that are widely derided and make a case for their re-evaluation.

– Bangs gavel –

So, in the dock before us today we have: Alien³.

The case against the second sequel to Squidly Rott’s (sorry) haunted house in space film is pretty well documented, but let me summarise it here.

  1. In its first ten minutes, the movie does away with two of the emotional anchors of its immediate predecessor, Aliens, namely Newt and Hicks. Emotionally it’s all downhill from here.
  2. There are long stretches of the movie where there’s not much tension (and very little else).
  3. The quadrupedal alien, aka man’s worst friend/xeno-woof, is objectively goofy.
  4. The inhabitants of Fiorina 161 (Fury) present a cast of poorly developed characters, most of whom all blur into one dude with a skinhead and a Bible-itch.
  5. They kill Ripley
  6. THEY KILL RIPLEY
  7. I SAID THEY KILL RIPLEY!

Traditionally, the movie’s apologists have pointed to the chaos around the film’s production and it’s worth taking a moment to remember exactly how much of a definition of development hell this movie was.

So stay frosty, people, I’m going to do this as quickly as I can, (you can also just skip ahead. For those gentle readers with a yen for this sort of grimoire there’s an in-depth account here):

The mere existence of this book speaks volumes

Producers Walter Hill & David Giler hired William Gibson for a cyber-punk styled sequel that Fox airlocked, then Renny Harlin (Die Hard 2) came aboard with Eric Red (Near Dark) just as Sigourney Weaver became disillusioned on the series’ obsession with guns, so David Twohy (Critters 2) delivered a Cold War-in-space draft without Ripley until Fox demanded her reinstatement, after which Vincent Ward (The Navigator) pitched his space-monks on a five-mile wooden planet with writer John Fasano before being jettisoned because, well, actually insane, whereupon rookie David Fincher inherited the mess with Larry Ferguson (Highlander), whose portrayal of Ripley Sigourney Weaver rejected, which forced Hill & Giler back, only for them to be secretly rewritten by Rex Pickett when Fox hated their ending, in a move worthy of Weyland-Yutani itself. Giler then produced another nine(!) revisions of the movie, but by this point they were already building sets.

(Phew.)

David Fincher has famously stated that working on Alien³ was the worst experience of his life due to Fox’s overbearing presence. After filming wrapped, there were extensive reshoots and extra sequences inserted into the film at the studio’s insistence prior to its release. (And let’s not even mention those dire publicity photos of poor old Sigourney in a bald cap).

Buy me a cup of tea?

Eventually, the movie was released in 1992 to very mixed reviews and domestic underperformance. Fincher himself (perhaps unsurprisingly) treats the film the way the rest of us treat the last two Indiana Jones sequels. I mean, there were only ever three Indy movies right?

Alien 3 DC | Movies / Series | Filme aliens, Filmes classicos e ...
Whoever produced this poster’s strapline clearly had no sense of irony.

But, despite (and perhaps because) of this, Alien³ is deeply weird and eerie, certainly possessed of a more haunted and tragic atmosphere than any predecessor or sequel. Certainly, I can’t imagine any contemporary franchise instalment taking the risks this film does and one could make the case that the film’s balls-out nutso bravery flies in the face of the reheated duds that have come in its wake.

So, working through the common objections one by one:

Newt & Hicks, nixed.

Yeah, a difficult one, but I think Newt and Hicks not making it to Fury works pretty well as a statement of intent. This film is a departure from what has come before and it sets the tone unashamedly for what’s to come. This isn’t going to be a gung-ho film about space marines.

Newt and Hicks’ deaths also mean that Ripley is grieving throughout the narrative and Weaver’s performance is easily the best thing about the film. In fact, I’d argue that it’s her best work in the series. The loneliness, vulnerability and strength that she brings to the portrayal of grief here are visceral.

Nothing to see here, (prison) guvnor

Similarly, I’d argue that the long lingering shots of the corridors and ventilation shafts that comprise Fury’s prison facility are freighted with a deep sense of liminal horror. The opening scene, where the camera creeps through the crash debris of the EEV, its slow tracking through the tunnels and shafts of the lead-works combined with the surveillance footage of deserted corridors, crackling fluorescent lights and humming machinery are all reminiscent of Nikolaus Geyrhalter’s deep-time classic Homo Sapiens. These are all spaces that should be populated, but aren’t, possessed of a sense of dread, of something missing or withheld, charged with the same creepypasta unease as the Backrooms.

if you’re enjoying this, you could buy me a cup of tea

Depopulated, de-centred

Nowhere is this eerie payload more evident than in the emergence of the creature itself. This chest-bursting moment is at complete odds with the gross-out splatter-core of the original movie. In both the theatrical version and the assembly cut the alien’s birth is intercut with Hicks and Newt’s funeral, but in each version, the xeno-woof (theatrical)/oxo-morph (assembly cut) emerges from its animal host in an unpeopled space. In the assembly cut ,the birth is even followed by a long, lonely pull-out from Babe the ox showing the birth site surrounded by empty space.

Even with poor Spike the dog’s death throes in the theatrical cut, the birth scene has an odd, disassociated feel to it more than one of straightforward horror. Partly, I think, this is because at this point in the series chest-bursting had become an expected staple of the Alien movies, but also because, yet again, this pivotal scene is happening unbeknownst to Ripley and the prison population. The humans are de-centred in their own story.

This Whippet was originally planned to star as the Xenomorph for a ...
Whippet … good? (with apologies to Devo)

Xeno-woof/Oxo-morph

Much has been made of Fincher’s dog-in-a-suit xeno-woof, but in the film’s defence the only dog shots are mercifully brief and, in the assembly cut, were cleaned up by the DVD restoration team with greatly improved compositing. For me, the creature works as a classic form of weird ontology that upsets categories, is it a dog/ox/alien? The cute post-birth puppetry of the bambi-burster only reinforces how disturbing the creature’s mutability is.

Look at me! I am soooo cute!

But also, I will eat your fucking face.

A seven foot walking cock with metal teeth

It’s no secret that H.R. Giger designed the xenomorph to be a seven-foot ambulatory cock with metal teeth, but Alien³ is the only movie in the series that draws an explicit parallel between the creature’s threat to bodily autonomy and sexual violence.

From this point of view, it’s possible to view the prisoners’ lack of individuality, specifically their shaved heads, uniforms and blurred identities as a way of collapsing them into a kind of faceless hostile masculinity.

Certainly, from her first entrance into the prison mess hall, Ripley is the focus of a predatory male gaze and her female identity is blamed explicitly by the prisoner’s leader, Dillon, for bringing “temptation” into their midst.

This ugly mood comes to a head most starkly when a group of prisoners attempt to sexually assault Ripley at the lead-works, but is also directly paralleled in the way in which the alien itself “leers” over her later when it traps her in the infirmary, its secondary jaw hovering with what seems to be sexual menace.

Both of these grim moments stage Ripley’s body as a site of threatened violation, reinforcing patriarchal stereotypes and drawing uncomfortable parallels between male and monstrous aggression.

Chip in, so I can buy a bald cap of my very own?

THEY KILL RIPLEY!

Yes, they do. But there’s a grace and beauty in her final sacrifice. It can be read as a final and definitive act of agency and autonomy. A noble fuck you to Bishop 2 and the Weyland-Yutani goons trying to exploit her and the alien embryo that she carries.

Again though, the film (at least in its theatrical version) delivers a strange and disturbing final image. In her last moments, as Ripley tumbles to her death, the alien bursts from her chest. She grabs it, holding it in an uncanny mirror of a mother-infant embrace, cradling it until they’re both swallowed by the molten metal below.

It’s a touching and deeply weird moment, which feels to me at least, like a fitting and dignified capstone to the trilogy.

In the end, Alien³ may be flawed, but I would say that its utter strangeness and sombre mood make it far more than a failure. Yes, it is bleak, but it’s also a very weird and eerily singular film with an emotional impact that, for me at least, lingers long after the credits have rolled.

But, more importantly, what do you think?

Playlist:


My debut fantasy novel, The Lighthouse at the End of the World is published on April 7th 2026 by Titan Books. Pre-order it here.